When Gandhi finally meets up with his colleagues he finds out what the actual social conditions are in South Africa, yet up until then, he was ignorant of these. What does this say of communications in this time period?
What is Gandhi’s decision regarding the social conditions in South Africa?
The social conditions in South Africa in the past shows us that the people, who live there, accept it without thinking of their suffering. They are frightened and have fear to beat for their rights. In this part of the story Gandhi decides to stand up for the rights of the Indians in South Africa. This could be trace back to the fact that he would discriminated in a racistic way in a train, where a guard throws him out because he sat in the first class although he is an Indian. Gandhi developped a passive resistence, which he called Satyagraha and started with his political engagement in South Africa.
Contrast the second meeting that Gandhi has about the pass law. Pay spacial attention to his speech techniques as well as the crowd’s reaction. He also gives his philosohpy of passive resistance. What is it?
Gandhi speaks very calm and doesn’t let himself provoke by the listener, who says that they would beat the British and that they would fight against them. But on religious grounds Hindus aren’t allowed to kill human, so Gandhi appeal for a fight for their right without violence. This is the basic of his philosphy of passive resistance, which contains non-violence (Ahimsa) and the attendance to bear suffer and pain. The background of this idea is to win the emeny as a friend. Gandhi sees Satyagraha not as a weapon of the poor people, but as a weapon of the mental strong persons.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyagraha)
Describe the massacre of Indians by the British army and list the various results from the event, both for the Indians as well as the British.
The Indians protested for their independence in Amritsar but over hundred were killed by the Britsh. At a later date, an other protest march claims more Indian victims and because of that the policemen were killed. After this event there are riots everywhere in India.
What is the “salt march” and why is it significant? What is Gandhi’s philosophy of civil resistance? How is this philosophy further exhibited by the Indian demonstration at the salt works?
The salt march should clarify the civil disobedience and should be a sign against the dependence of the high taxes by the Britsh gouvernment. Gandhi and his follower walked 385 kilometers to the Arabian Sea, where he demonstrated his civil disobedience. It exhibits that the Indians fight for their independence without using violence. This conforms with the strategy of Gandhi of passive resistance.
The last part of the movie incorporates the same scene as the movie’s opening: the assassination scene. Why do you think the director uses this scene twice? Cinematically speaking, what are the differences between the first version of the scenes and the second? As a member of the audience, compare your reaction from the first viewing of the scene to the second.
I think that the first scene should show us that Ghandi was such a holy person, and because of that his funeral was a big cermony with thousands of people. That we can see this scene in the beginning makes us curious and we want to know how it comes to his death. The difference between the scenes is, that we just see the killing first and in the second scene we see the funeral, where his ash were dispersed over the sea and we know the background of the life of Gandhi with his political engagement.